- Endure suffering for Christ’s sake (Col 1:24)
- Serve the church for Christ’s sake (Col 1:25-27)
- Tell the good news for Christ’s sake (Col 1:28-29)
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Colossians 1:24-29 - Serving Christ
Christ's witness to Biblical inerrancy
Continued from: Biblical inerrancy in church historyChrist’s witness to the Scriptures is plain. Jesus saw God as the source of Scripture and the Holy Spirit as the author (Matt 15:4 “God said”; 22:43).
Jesus emphasized the importance of every word having divine authority (Matt 5:18; Mark 12:24-27: “I am the God of Abraham”; Luke 16:17: “It is easier for heaven and earth to disappear than for the least stroke of a pen to drop out of the Law”).
Jesus believed the Scriptures must be fulfilled because God cannot lie (Matt 26:52-54; Luke 24:44; John 10:35).
Jesus placed himself under the Bible’s authority (Matt 4:4, 7, 10; Luke 24:25-26).[1] Christ gave full acceptance to the Old Testament. He himself believed its prophets and prophecies (Matt 5:12; 13:57; 21:34-36; 23:29-37; Mark 6:4 [cf. Luke 4:24; John 4:44]; 12:2-5; Luke 6:23; 11:47-51; 13:34; 20:10-12; including false prophets Luke 6:26) and cited its miracles.
He believed in a real Adam and Eve (Matt 19:4-5; Mark 10:6-8); that Cain killed Abel (Matt 23:35; Luke 11:51); in the worldwide flood at the time of Noah (Matt 24:37-39; Luke 17:26-27); that God spoke to Moses from a burning bush (Luke 20:37) and gave the Law through him (Matt 8:4; 19:8; Mark 1:44; 7:10; 10:5; 12:26; Luke 5:14; 20:37; John 5:46; 7:19); the reality of Abraham (John 8:56); the institution of circumcision (John 7:22; cf. Gen 17:10-12; Lev 12:3); in Sodom and Gomorrah (Matt 10:15; 11:23-24; Luke 10:12); in Lot (Luke 17:28-32); Isaac and Jacob (Matt 8:11; Luke 13:28); in manna (John 6:31, 49, 58); the serpent in the desert (John 3:14); in David eating consecrated bread (Matt 12:3-4; Mark 2:25-26; Luke 6:3-4), that David wrote psalms (Matt 22:43; Mark 12:36; Luke 20:42); in Solomon (Matt 6:29; 12:42; Luke 11:31; 12:27; Elijah (Luke 4:25-26); Elisha (Luke 4:27); that Jonah was in a fish three days (Matt 12:39-40; Luke 11:29-30, 32); and that Daniel’s predictions were accurate (Matt 24:15); and in Zechariah the prophet (Luke 11:51).
But what about Jesus use of story as illustrations?
It is argued that Jesus may have used these OT stories not as history but as legends to teach a lesson, but a careful reading of the Lord’s manner of using these stories clearly leaves no room except that He considered them historical.[2] Some say Jesus was accommodating the culture, but Abraham Kuyper has shown that such a view of Christ is untenable for any Christian who accepts Jesus’ moral integrity, much more his deity.[3]
Further, Jesus was a pretty unaccommodating person on anything he considered in error, such as the Pharisees’ teaching. Some say that since Jesus was human, he too was subject to error, but that suggests a problem with one’s Christology, one’s understanding of the person and work of Christ. If you correct your Lord, who is Lord?
Even if you take the Gospels as halfway credible, it is plain how Jesus viewed Scripture. Kuyper concludes, “Either Jesus’ view of the Scripture is the true one, and then we would kneel in His presence; or Jesus’ view of the Scripture is an enormous mistake, in which case the Rabbi of Nazareth can no longer be the absolute guide along the way of faith.”[4]
What we know of Christ is that he believed in the inerrancy of Scripture. In order to be logically consistent, one must believe in both Christ and biblical inerrancy or neither one.
For the Christian the choice is plain.[5] While technically speaking one can be saved and be a noninerrantist, intellectually speaking one cannot be a follower of Jesus Christ and at the same time disbelieve inerrancy. Jesus Christ himself has laid that choice before us, “If you believe not his writings, how shall you believe my words?” (John 5:47). If Christ is your Lord, then how can your view differ from His and be intellectually honest?
[1] John S. Hammett, THE6110 Christian Theology I Class Lecture Notes, (Wake Forest, NC: Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, Fall 2008), 29.
[2] John Wenham, “Christ’s View of Scripture,” in Inerrancy, ed. Norm Geisler (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1979), 3-12.
[4] Abraham Kuyper, Encyclopedia of Sacred Theology: Its Principles, trans. J. Hendrick de Vries (New York: Scribners, 1898), 459.
[5] Harris, 17.
Objections to Biblical Inerrancy #1 & #2, #3 & #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Friday, August 28, 2009
Biblical inerrancy in church history
Continued from: Objection to Biblical Inerrancy #12Laird Harris says that the historic Protestant tradition has been obvious in its belief in the Bible as true and without error in its entirety. [1] Among Catholics, the Council of Trent was as clear on the subject of biblical inerrancy as any Protestant would wish. In the ancient church, the Nicene Fathers expressed faith in the whole and entire nature of Scripture and its lack of contradiction.
Even earlier, Irenaeus said that “the Scriptures are indeed perfect since they were spoken by the Word of God and his Spirit.”[2] Justin Martyr about A.D. 150 wrote, “I am entirely convinced that no Scripture contradicts another.”[3] Harris says that those who knew the Apostles made similar statements, men like Polycarp, Ignatius, and Clement.
The idea of inerrancy is ancient and widespread. Why? Something powerful about the Scripture must have persuaded them. Where we have seen the earnest believers in Jesus Christ down through history, we have found in them confidence in the Scriptures. Where we have found a distancing and skepticism for the Bible, we have seen either a movement toward denial of Christ or conversely a renewal and a drawing again to a more complete faith in Christianity’s book. While one must not believe in the Bible to be saved, throughout history we have seen that Christian faith has difficulty maintaining itself without it.[4]
Martin Luther in his characteristic diplomacy wrote, “It is impossible for the Scripture to contradict itself except at the hands of senseless and hardened hypocrites. At the hands of those who are godly and understanding, it gives testimony to its Lord.”[5] John Calvin declared in his Institutes that there are plenty of proofs to convince any reasonable person of the Bible’s divine authority and truth, but all the arguments of men will never convince a single skeptic without the “internal persuasion of the Holy Spirit.” He says that the conviction that the Bible is the Word of God “cannot be known without faith.”[6] He and the Westminster Confession leave it right there. The Scripture is self-authenticating through the inward work of the Holy Spirit. While it may not at first seem like an intellectually satisfying answer, perhaps there is more wisdom in the statement than is apparent.
Irenaeus based the authority of Scripture on the authority and person of Christ. “When I heard some saying, ‘If I do not find it in the ancient Scriptures I will not believe the Gospel,’ on my saying to them, it is written, they answered me, ‘That remains to be proved.’ But to me Jesus is in the place of all that is ancient. His cross, and death, and resurrection and the faith which is by Him are undefiled monuments of antiquity.”[7]
[1] R. Laird Harris, “The Basis for our Belief in Inerrancy,” Bulletin of the Evangelical Theological Society 9/1 (1966): 13.
[2] Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 2:28:2.
[4] Harris, 14.
[5] Martin Luther, (LW, 26, 295) quoted in Siegbert W. Becker, “Luther and Inerrancy,” Joint Conference of the North and South Metropolitan Circuits of the Southeastern Wisconsin District, Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, November 15, 1982. Accessed November 25, 2008; available from here. Becker says that Luther’s rejection of the epistle “of James is actually a consequence of his strong conviction concerning biblical inerrancy. Luther believed firmly that the Bible could not contradict itself. But he also believed that James contradicted Paul.”
[6] John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, 1:8:13. See also the Westminster Confession ch. 1, sec. 5.
[7] Ignatius, To the Philadelphians, ch. 8.
Also on Sunday in the South:
Objections to Biblical Inerrancy #1 & #2, #3 & #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12
Thursday, August 27, 2009
The power of praise in prayer
Praise is an important part of prayer. Praise Transforms . . .
- Defeat into triumph: Praise is mightier than armies (2 Chronicles 20:20-27).
- Insurmountable obstacles into rubble: Praise is stronger than walls (Joshua 6:1-21).
- Imprisonment and abuse into freedom and salvation (Acts 16:22-34)
- Sickness into health as it affirms the promise of covenant benefits (Psalm 103:1-3)
- Weakness into strength as we abide in complete dependence on Him (Psalm 84)
- Transforms mourning into joy (Isaiah 61:1-2)
The Sacrifice of Praise
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Objection to Biblical Inerrancy #12
Continued from Objection to Biblical Inerrancy #11A final objection is that inerrancy is “a pre-critical, pre-scientific idea.” That is an arrogant position, and assumes that no one who went before us was able to have as deep and profound a thought about the Scripture’s nature as we have.
Assuming we are more intelligent than two millennia of Christian thinkers is a product of evolutionary psychology. For example in just the area of the Trinity, we have writings of profound thinking in the early church.
Yes, we have more understanding of science and technology today, but have we improved in the areas of selfishness and generosity? Actually, we are more efficient at killing.
Inerrancy assumes a certain humility, that I am not the apex of all knowledge. Inerrantists place themselves under the authority of Scripture. They do not set themselves in judgment of it.[1] Martin Luther modeled this humility. Becker says,
“When Luther was unable to see any importance in some of the words of Scripture he ascribed his lack of insight to his sinful flesh and to the weakness of his faith. In other words, when modern unbelievers who masquerade as Christian scholars find something in the Bible that seems unimportant or inexplicable to them, they immediately assume that there must be something wrong with the Bible. Luther, on the other hand, in a similar situation would come to the conclusion that there was something wrong with him. . . . ‘It is absurd,” [Luther writes,] ‘to imitate those audacious geniuses who immediately shout that a manifest error has been committed whenever such a difficulty arises and who without shame dare emend book that are not their own.’ . . . Instead of approaching the Bible with imagined superior wisdom and knowledge, we are to assume the difficulty lies not in the Bible but in our ignorance.”[2]
[1] Much of the foregoing is based in John S. Hammett, THE6110 Christian Theology I Class Lecture Notes, (Wake Forest, NC: Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, Fall 2008), 41-43.
[2] Becker, “Luther and Inerrancy.”
Also on Sunday in the South:
Objections to Biblical Inerrancy #1 & #2, #3 & #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11
Sunday, August 23, 2009
Colossians 1:21-23 - Christ's Gospel

Opening thought: The Uncivil War was carnage. Over 600,000 Americans died. Then Jefferson Davis of the Confederacy died. And Ulysses Grant of the Union died. Their widows, Varina Davis and Julia Grant, settled near each other. They became closest of friends. [1]
Pray & Read: Colossians 1:21-23
Contextual Notes: Last week we looked at Paul’s awe-inspiring statement of Christ’s deity and reconciliation to the world (Col 1:20). Now Paul takes that cosmic reconciliation and applies it to you and me, repeating the theme of the death of Christ Jesus doing the work of reconciliation. He mentions again several things he first brought up at the beginning of his letter (v. 4-6), faith, hope, hearing the gospel, and its global reach.
Key Truth: Paul wrote Colossians 1:21-23 to teach the Colossian Christians that sin makes us enemies of God; Christ makes us holy friends of God, and the Gospel then makes us servants.
Key Application: Today I want to show you what God’s Word says about Christ’s Gospel.
Sermon Points:
- By default we are Christ’s enemies (Col 1:21)
- By grace we become Christ’s friends (Col 1:22)
- For the Gospel we are Christ’s servants (Col 1:23)
Exposition: Note well,
1. BY DEFAULT WE ARE CHRIST’S ENEMIES (COL 1:21).
a. “And you were once strangers”: The construction of these words denote a continuous, settled state of estrangement from God. “And even hostile”: could be enemies or ‘even more, hostile.” In your minds / attitudes. “Expressed through your wicked deeds/evil works.”[2]
b. ILLUSTRATION: Eight out of 10 Americans believe in an afterlife of some sort, according to the poll by the California-based Barna Research Group. Nearly two-thirds of respondents believe they will go to heaven. Only one-half of one percent expect to go to hell upon their death. One in every four adults admitted that they have "no idea" what will happen after they die.
c. Less than half of those who say they are heaven bound (43 percent), however, believe they will go to heaven because they have "confessed their sins and accepted Jesus Christ as their savior," which is the teaching of Scripture.
d. Others felt they will get to heaven because "they have tried to obey the 10 Commandments" (15 percent) or because "they are basically a good person" (15 percent). Another 6 percent believed their entrance to heaven would be based upon the fact that "God loves all people and will not let them perish."[3]
e. APPLICATION: The Apostle Paul has something to say about that in this verse. Paul makes it clear that if Christ is not your Lord, you are estranged from him and are his enemy. Your sin makes you his enemy. You say, well, I’m a pretty good person. I take care of my wife. I provide for my family. I work hard and am honest with my company. I’m probably going to make it to heaven. I’m afraid there is a dreadful FYI in this passage. Everyone is a sinner and without a genuine relationship with Christ Jesus, there will be no heaven for you. You cannot live your whole life like you want and then expect Christ to bail you out when you stand before Him for judgment.
f. If you think that sounds harsh, then perhaps you are not seeing sin from God’s perspective. Sin is something you were born with. No one had to teach you how to be disobedient to the Lord. It comes from the Original Sin of Adam and Eve. Sin is a rebellious slap in the face of a gracious, loving, creative, and holy God. It is a great offense against his Rule and Reign. Sin in criminal activity committed against the Lord. Sin will destroy you in this life and in the life to come.
g. Some of us think we are like GM or Chrysler, but I have bad news. You are not too big to fail. If you continue rebelliously in your sin, you will die and be in hell for eternity. Hell is for those who never accept Christ’s free gift of eternal life. That gift comes without strings attached, but it transforms you and makes you a new person and gives you new priorities so that you want to do things differently than you did before. It orients you toward serving the Lord Jesus Christ. Being rescued from sin is a no-brainer. At the invitation today at the end of this sermon, let me encourage you to come down the aisle and talk with me about receiving Christ as your Lord and Savior.
2. BY GRACE WE BECOME CHRIST’S FRIENDS (COL 1:22).
a. Reconciled: (ἀποκατήλλαξεν) is a strong word meaning to change from an enemy to a friend.
b. The construction here is more than present time. It is the condition now since reconciliation. The fleshy, earthly human body is used to distinguish from both the spiritual Body of Christ and a docetic Christology that minimizes Christ’s body and humanity. It was Christ’s death in a physical body which brought us reconciliation (Rom 5:10).[4]
c. “To present you holy”: You are reconciled for a purpose in the future, the idea here is not of a result that has already been achieved, but of a future to fulfill. And look at the word holy. The two negatives define the holy, without blemish and without blame. We are holy “before him” or “in his sight.” The verdict is in, and we have been made holy through Christ’s reconciliation.[5]
d. APPLICATION: Christianity is not a get-out-of-hell-free card. It is a call to a future. This is why it is so tragic when someone walks down an aisle, gets baptized, walks out the back door, and you never hear from them again. Something is desperately deformed in that kind of religion. If Christ means enough to you to go to the trouble of going through the religious motions of a public profession of faith and baptism and there is no fruit afterwards, then there is a real question of whether that person was ever really born again in Christ Jesus. When God presents you as holy, it is for a future and for you to grow as a disciple of Jesus. This discussion also calls into accountability the leadership of the church. We Southern Baptists rightly focus on the importance of evangelism, but our focus is sometimes so intense that we forget that conversion is simply the beginning. We can’t pat that person on the back and say, “OK, great! You’re a Christian now! Now go do it!” They don’t know how to do it. It is each Christian’s responsibility to have someone under their arm, teaching them what they know about the Lord, teaching them to pray, training them in Bible study, etc. The trouble is, not many of us who claim to be his disciples are actually walking with him in such a way that we would feel comfortable discipling a new believer. It is time to get serious about disciplemaking.
3. FOR THE GOSPEL WE ARE CHRIST’S SERVANTS (COL 1:23)
a. εἴ γε: “If indeed,” “provided that.” Γε emphasizes εἴ and makes it an actual condition that Paul is confident will be fulfilled: “I am confident/assuming that you will.” (see 2:5b). ἐπιμένετε expresses an active persistence rather than a passive continuing in your faith: “assuming that you will have active persistence in the Faith.” Established and firm (τεθεμελιωμένοι καὶ ἑδραῖοι): literally, “laying a foundation and not easily changing one’s home” thus “steadfast.” (μὴ μετακινούμενοι) never abandoning, the hope which is the gospel that you heard. This gospel has been preached (“in the whole of creation” or “to every type of human creature”) under heaven. This does not mean it has been preached to every single human being, but throughout the cosmos (see 1:16; 2:10, 15). Paul had become that gospel’s servant, literally, deacon: διάκονος.[6]
b. ILLUSTRATION: An ancient Christian leader named St. Clement of Alexandria once said, “For the sake of each of us he laid down his life--worth no less than the universe. He demands of us in return our lives for the sake of each other.”
c. APPLICATION: We are called to discipleship, to grow in Christ, but that is not all. We are also called to be disciple-makers to become servants of the Hope found in Christ in serving others and helping them to grow in Christ. We are called to take that discipleship to the ends of the earth, as this passage indicates. It has been proclaimed in the cosmos through the death and resurrection of Christ (Eph 3:10-11). How are you being involved in these areas of serving the Lord through being a servant to His Gospel?