Italy from space |
In the line at the store,
the cashier told an older woman that she should bring her own grocery bags
because plastic bags weren't good for the environment.
The woman apologized to him
and explained, "We didn't have the green thing back in my day." The
clerk responded, "That's our problem today. Your generation did not care
enough to save our environment.”
He was right -- that generation didn't have the green thing in its day.
Back then, people only returned milk bottles and soda bottles to the store
which sent them back to the bottling plant to be washed, sterilized, and
refilled so it could use the same bottles over and over. They didn’t know they
were recycling.
But the green thing wasn’t around back in the day. People walked up
stairs, because they didn't have an escalator in every store and office
building. They walked to the grocery store and didn't climb into a
300-horsepower machine every time we had to go two blocks.
They didn't have the green thing in their day. Back then, they washed
the baby's diapers because they didn't have the throw-away kind. They dried
clothes on a line, not in a 220 volt, energy gobbling machine. They used wind
and solar power to dry clothes before the government announced it was a good
idea. And kids got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not
always brand-new clothing. More recycling.
But there was no environmental
responsibility back in their day. Back then, home had one TV or radio in the house
-- not a TV in every room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a
handkerchief, not a screen the size of the state of Montana. In the kitchen, people
blended and stirred by hand because no one had electric machines to do
everything for us.
When they packaged a fragile
item to send in the mail, they used a wadded up old newspaper to cushion it,
not Styrofoam or plastic bubble wrap. Back then, they didn't fire up an engine
and burn gasoline just to mow the lawn. There were actually green-friendly push
mowers that ran on human power. And everyone exercised by working so they
didn't need to go to a health club to run on treadmills that operate on
electricity.
But that clerk was right.
People were not into creation care back then. They drank from water fountains instead
of using cups or plastic bottles every time we had a drink of water. They
actually refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and they
replaced the razor blades in a razor instead of throwing away the whole razor
just because the blade got dull.
But there was no
environmental concern back then. People took the streetcar or a bus and kids
rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their moms into a
24-hour taxi service. There was only one electrical outlet in a room, not an
entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances. And no one needed a
computerized gadget to receive a signal beamed from satellites 2,000 miles out
in space in order to find the nearest pizza joint.
While the self-righteousness of youth, when we are still young enough
to know everything, can give us fits, it is true that the interaction of the
generations can call our attention to important blind spots in our culture as
well, and one of those areas is the care of Creation. Richard Land of the
Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention says
that people “from
all areas of the globe and all walks of life, including Christians, have been
involved in ecological carelessness. The Western world, which is often noted
for being founded on Christian traditions, has been a leader in misusing God’s
creation. But, this should not be the case, for there is a clear biblical
directive to support environmental care,”[1]
Today the issue before us is environmentalism – being green. Is it
Biblical? Is environmentalism something that Christians should be involved
with?
Some of
you might be asking the question: “Why would you be preaching a message on
environmentalism? You ought to stick to the Bible, you ought to preach messages
on the Gospel and on this and that but not on things like global warming!”
Friends, we have grown too accustomed in the world today to not look at God’s
Word and what it has to say about the issues of the day. It was common in the
past in this nation to preach on current events. For example, here are a few
sermons titles that come from the history of this country. When things would
occur pastors would preach on it because believers turned to their pastor so
they could know what God’s word had to say about the events of the day. One
pastor preached a message on the great fire in Boston the Sunday after the
fire. Another pastor preached a message on a solar eclipse that occurred on
June 16, 1806. Can you imagine preaching on that subject? But this pastor preached
a message about a solar eclipse because people wanted to know what God’s word
had to say about the solar eclipses. Another sermon was on the moral view of
railroads, and it is about connecting the country and the impact that would
have on the moral discourse of the nation. There was also a sermon occasioned
by the hanging of Henry Blackburn. How many sermons have you heard preached on
executions?
The point is that in the early history of our nation, God’s people turned to the Bible and to their pastors to find out how to interpret the events of the day. And we need to get back to that practice because God’s word has application to every aspect of life. And that includes the issue of creation care or environmentalism. Before we buy into all the hype that Hollywood has pumped into this issue, and swallow Al Gore’s doomsday scenarios and run around with our hair on fire and in a panic, before we demand for the government to save us and end up in worse shape than we were before all the hysteria, we need to take a deep breath and consult the Scriptures and look at what God’s word has to say about this issue.
The point is that in the early history of our nation, God’s people turned to the Bible and to their pastors to find out how to interpret the events of the day. And we need to get back to that practice because God’s word has application to every aspect of life. And that includes the issue of creation care or environmentalism. Before we buy into all the hype that Hollywood has pumped into this issue, and swallow Al Gore’s doomsday scenarios and run around with our hair on fire and in a panic, before we demand for the government to save us and end up in worse shape than we were before all the hysteria, we need to take a deep breath and consult the Scriptures and look at what God’s word has to say about this issue.
Contextual Notes:
In
Genesis 1, we see God exercising his creative power. By merely speaking, he
brings the universe into being. His focus is on planet Earth which he carefully
shapes to support life and then populates it with living creatures. The crown
of his creation is men and women made in his own image, and he places them in
authority over His precious Creation. While his awesome power is displayed in
Creation, the clear focus of God’s loving concern is the human beings he made
and placed in responsibility.
Key Truth: Moses
wrote Genesis 1:26-31 to teach Israel that humanity
was created in God’s image and thus are the crown of creation, and were then
given authority over creation by God Himself.
Key Application: Today I
want to show you what God’s Word says about caring for creation.
Pray and Read:
Genesis 1:26-31
Sermon Points:
1. God
created humanity as the crown of Creation (Gen 1:26-27)
2. God
blessed humanity with authority over Creation (Gen 1:28-31)
Exposition: Note
well,
1.
GOD BLESSED HUMANITY AS THE CROWN OF
CREATION (Gen 1:26-27)
a.
Gen.
1:26 – The privileged position of human beings is seen in the deliberative
decision that the Trinity makes in an important conference. “Let us make man”
indicates a solemn decision emphasizing something new and important is
happening.
b.
Man
is a completely new creation, essentially different from all the other
creatures. The master commentator Leupold said a century ago, “He is to be
allied to heaven as no other creature on earth is. He is to be related to the
eternal Being himself,” but he quickly adds the relation is not in matter but
in form, not in essence but in resemblance. Man is not God; he did not spring
from deity as some myths teach and thus be divine himself or even half divine.
Rather, he was purposely formed in the likeness of his Creator, in a spiritual,
not a material conformity. Like God, we think, speak, will, and act.[2]
Like God, we are three in one, body, mind, and spirit (1 Thess. 5:23).
c.
APPLICATION: The value of every human life,
then, finds its bedrock in its creation in the image of God. No matter the
circumstances of the conception, no matter the mental or physical state of the
elderly patient, no matter the abilities or inabilities of a person, every
person has value and a purpose and a plan because each person is made in God’s
image. This is why life is precious. This is why we build hospitals and have a
health care industry. This is why we are pro-life. This is why we oppose
abortion. This is why we oppose the killing of innocent life. This is why we
oppose policies like China’s one-child policy. This is why we oppose the early
termination of life in the elderly. This is why we oppose war unless it is
absolutely necessary to protect life, to protect the liberty of life, and to
protect civilization that embraces the value of life. This is why we oppose
stem cell research and production from human embryos. This is why every person
should have dignity in life and dignity at the end of their lives.
d. Evolutionist
environmentalism is a denial of God’s sovereignty. It is a
denial of God’s sovereignty. It is humanism and the church, Christian leaders,
are buying into humanism. That we must save ourselves. We have to save the
planet. How can we save the planet when if we worry we cannot add one-inch to
our stature? How arrogant is that. God created the earth and He alone sustains
it. Genesis one chapter one says “In the beginning God created the heavens and
the earth.” Al Gore may have created the Internet but God created the heavens
and the earth.
2.
GOD BLESSED HUMANITY WITH AUTHORITY
OVER CREATION (Gen 1:28-31)
a.
And let them rule – Now the relationship with other
creatures is defined, and that definition is responsible stewardship. And in
verse 28, the Lord by His sovereignty grants authority to men and women on the
planet over all other animals. God has specifically established the fact that
He is the owner and true ruler of the earth (Ex. 9:29, 19:9; Is. 45:12).
Everything comes from God, so He is the ultimate owner. Yet, as Psalm 115:16
states, “the earth [God] has given to man.”[3]
b.
APPLICATION: The sway and responsibility of man
ought to be for the good of the planet and its animals, not because in some
evolutionary way we have no more right to earth’s resources than animals do,
but because we have been given authority and stewardship and care for creation
by Divine fiat from the Throne itself. With a formal grant with one exception
(Gen 2:17), man was granted authority over the plant kingdom, and Adam’s
vocation, his calling, was to work the earth “and take care of it” (Gen 2:15).
c. APPLICATION:
How foolish it is, then, to worship the earth or anything it contains. The earth
is the Lord’s, and the fullness thereof, says Psalm 24:1. Global warming
environmentalists want to deify “Mother
Earth.” Yes, we should take care of God’s beautiful creation. We need to
take care of it. But we are not subservient to creation nor should we worship
it. We are not here to serve the earth. The earth is here for us to use. Jeremiah
railed against the idolatrous worship of the Queen of Heaven in chapters 7 and
44.
d.
Genesis 1:28 - The first command in Scripture is
to be fruitful and increase. Gen. 1:28 makes it clear that God intended a
sinless Adam and Eve to have children and “increase in number.” The second
command is to rule (radah) over
creation and to subdue (kabash) the
earth (Gen 1:28). This mission indicates that the first way in which all of us
can glorify and serve God is by reproducing and caring for his creation.
e. APPLICATION: This blessing protects us from
devaluing human life. Most people don’t
realize it, but a key part of fighting global warming is population control.
Now what is population control? It’s abortion, China one-child policies, It is
limiting the number of children. Humanism sees people as the problem. They
compete with other living things for natural resources. In the eyes of those
that are fighting global warming they need to reduce population. That means we
must cut down on the sizes of our families. They want to
dictate the size of families. They want to export abortion around the globe
from the United States. They want family planning which again is abortion and
contraception to limit the population. But people are not the problem. God says
be fruitful and multiply. There was no time expiration on that statement that
God gave to us. Be fruitful and multiply. The birthrate in Europe
has dropped drastically to about 1.5 births per female because of this message
of overpopulation. That rate cannot sustain their present population, and
population is declining in Europe. America’s rate is 2.1 births per woman, which
is a minimally sustainable birthrate that will keep the present population.
Russia’s rate is much worse at 1.1. Meanwhile Muslim birthrates are almost 4.5
per woman. Within the next 50 years all of Europe will be dominated by the
Muslim faith.
f.
God designed us to care for creation. “This pattern from the creation
account is continued throughout the Scriptures. God developed specific laws for
His people in the Old Testament in order to ensure that they care for nature.
He established laws of Sabbath rest and land resting to promote the health of
the people, the land, and the animals and to prevent all from being overworked
(Ex. 23:10-12). The book of Leviticus promotes proper sanitation and provides
legislation against improper disposal methods. Even in times of war God
demanded that the fruit trees not be indiscriminately destroyed5
(Deut. 20:19-20).”[4]
g.
Note
that man was not permitted to dominate each other. Since we all bear the image
of the Creator, we are instead to serve others (John 13:13-14; Gal 5:13; Eph
5:21). For food, God supplied plants and fruits, indicating that men and
animals were originally vegetarian. Only after the Flood at Gen. 9:3 are we permitted
to eat other creatures for food.
h. Gen
1:31 – God
evaluated each of the first five days and said that his creation was good (Gen
1: (Gen 1:4, 10, 18, 21, 25), but the sixth day when he created man was “very
good.” He does good things (Mark 10:18; Rom 8:28). Richard Land says, “The
reason for man’s abuse of nature, like all other negative aspects of humanity,
is because of sin and the Fall. When God created the heavens and the earth, He
deemed all of creation “very good” (Gen. 1:31). In doing so He created land,
water, plants, animals, and humans, and the entirety of creation worked
together in a perfect ecosystem. Because of the Fall, however, nature changed
from working in perfect harmony with man to a developing struggle between man
and the land. Due to the curse of sin, Adam was forced to toil with the earth
(Gen 3:17-19).”[5]
i. Have you
noticed Satan always counterfeits what God has established? Jesus said you need
to be able to read the signs. We need to be like the sons of Issachar who can
discern the times in which we live. But there are those who are trying to twist
the events that are occurring around us to tell us something else. This is what
is happening with environmentalism and global warming.
j. FALSE CLAIMS OF GLOBAL WARMING - First, let’s
analyze what the global warming theorists say. The Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change says these following things are going to occur because of global
warming that is man-made. They say there is going to be an increase in
temperature, an increase in sea levels, erratic and more extreme weather.
They say that there will be about a 1% increase in the temperature between now
and 2030. Now on average over the last several centuries the temperature has
risen by about one degree. Now some of you might remember this back in the
1970’s there was a fear that we were entering a new ice age. They were fearful
that the temperatures were turning colder. And so the world was moving into an
ice age, there was concern. Now just 30 years later we are in the hype of
global warming. But according to the logic of the global warming crowd (based
on evolution), there should be an incremental and inexorable move up in the
average temperatures. But we don’t see that.
k. Dr. Don Easterbrook at Western Washington University is not so
sure about global warming -- for the next 30 years at least. Here’s his conclusions:
(Larger image here.) Rather
than drastic global warming at a rate of 0.5C (1F) per decade, historic records
of past natural cycles suggest global
cooling for the first several decades of the 21st century to about 2030,
followed by global warming from about 2030 to about 2060, and renewed global
cooling from 2060 to 2090. […] Recent solar changes suggest that it could be
fairly severe, perhaps more like the 1880 to 1915 cool cycle than the more
moderate 1945-1977 cool cycle. [In 1998, the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climatic Change (IPPC) predicted that CO2 emissions would cause global warming
of 1F every decade until 2100, causing global catastrophe.] Now a decade later,
the global climate has not warmed 1F as forecast by the IPCC but has cooled
slightly until 2007-08 when global temperatures turned sharply downward. In
2008, NASA satellite imagery confirmed that the Pacific Ocean had switched from
the warm mode it had been in since 1977 to its cool mode, similar to that of
the 1945-1977 global cooling period. The shift strongly suggests that the next
several decades will be cooler, not warmer as predicted by the IPCC.Easterbrook's conclusion:
Global warming (i.e, the warming since 1977) is over. The minute
increase of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere (0.008%) was not the cause of
the warming- it was a continuation of natural
cycles that occurred over the past 500 years.
l. Scientists
have shown that the earth moves in 1,500 year cycles of warming and cooling. In
1,500 year cycles, the earth warms, and it cools. By the way NASA reports
warming on Mars, Jupiter and Pluto and the Titan moon around Neptune as well so
there is warming going around in the whole universe and beyond, so it looks
like the Sun might be responsible for warming. All you have to do is work
outside one day in the summer to figure that out.
m. Then the
government saw an opportunity. A report coming out of Washington, D.C. states,
“global warming called security threat. For a second time in a month private
consultants to the government are warning that human driven warming of the
climate poses risk to the national security of the United States.” The report
recommends that “climate change be integrated into the nation’s security
strategies and says that the United States should commit to a stronger national
and international role to help stabilize climate changes at levels that would
avoid significant destruction to global security and stability.” Such events are less akin to global
warming and more akin to the end times in which we are living. Luke 21:7-11: Jesus says there will be an
increase in extreme weather events and there will be great earthquakes in
various places. He says there will be famines, pestilence, and plagues.
n. There are several Misguided Views of the Environment here.
i.
Materialism
is a belief that nature
simply exists, energy is unlimited, and humans can solve any world problem
through science and technology. This view believes in humanity’s basic goodness
and ability to solve its own problems. It is purely anthropocentric
(man-centered), denying the existence of God as a Supreme Being and Creator.
Materialism is misguided because it places the focus on man and his ability to
reconcile environmental problems, though it was man who caused the problems.
Also, materialists believe that most environmental problems stem from the
maldistribution of resources (read: socialism). They believe that if others
were simply educated on the need to redistribute the resources and care for the
environment, all would be better. No educational system and technology will
ever completely heal the environment, because as Paul declares, nature is
groaning and waiting for the holistic regeneration of the earth that will take
place when Christ returns (Rom. 8:22).
ii.
Pantheism: Pantheism is the belief that all
things are God or God is all. Thus, nature is revered because it is divine.
Because pantheists believe that nature is divine, they desire not only to
protect it from destruction and misuse but also from being used for human
improvement and human purposes. They put humans on an equal level with nature
because all is God. Consequently, pantheists abhor the way man uses nature,
because they believe man has no right to dominion over nature and instead
should be a servant of nature. Pantheists are clearly mistaken because nature is
not God.
iii.
Dualistic
and Defeatist Christianity:
Dualistic Christians claim that the natural and physical world is evil and it
cannot be redeemed to something good. Therefore, they believe they are free to
treat that which is physical with disrespect and keep the focus of good things
only on the spiritual. Along with dualistic Christianity, some also cling to
defeatist Christianity, which is a belief that since this world is wasting away
it does not matter what one does about the current earth or environment.
Schaeffer calls this “poor Christianity, saying it is explicitly out of line
with God’s revealed Word. God purposefully called His creation “good” and “very
good.”
Invitation:
Global
environmental catastrophe may come, but that is not what you should fear. There
is only One you should fear, and that is the Lord. If you have not repented of
your sins and accepted Jesus Christ as your Savior you need to live in fear that
you will meet God unprepared. If you have settled that one thing you have
nothing else to fear because God is our refuge and our strength. Would you
respond to him right now?
Sources:
Tokunboh
Adeyemo, Africa Bible Commentary
F.F.
Bruce, International Bible Commentary
Creation
Care for Pastors, http://www.creationcareforpastors.com/in-the-bible/
Ethics
and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention: Andy
Lewis, “Policy Statement on Global Warming,” http://erlc.com/article/policy-statement-on-global-warming/,
2005; “The Bible Speaks on Ecology,” http://erlc.com/article/the-bible-speaks-on-ecology/,
Jan 24, 2006; “Environmental Stewardship: A Theological Model for the
Environment,” http://erlc.com/article/environmental-stewardship-a-theological-model-for-the-environment/.
Evangelical
Environmental Network, http://creationcare.org
H.C.
Leupold, International Critical
Commentary: Genesis, 1:65-75.
Tony
Perkins, “An Uncomfortable Truth: Global Warming or God’s Warning?” Luke 21.
Larry
Richards, Bible Reader’s Companion
[1] Richard Land, Environmental
Stewardship: A Theological Model for the Environment,
http://erlc.com/article/environmental-stewardship-a-theological-model-for-the-environment/
[2] H.C. Leupold, International Critical Commentary: Genesis, 1:68-9.
[3]
http://erlc.com/article/environmental-stewardship-a-theological-model-for-the-environment/
[4]
http://erlc.com/article/environmental-stewardship-a-theological-model-for-the-environment/
[5] Richard Land, “Environmental
Stewardship: A Theological Model for the Environment,”
http://erlc.com/article/environmental-stewardship-a-theological-model-for-the-environment/
If you think you are going to use the Bible as a weapon TO KEEP WOMEN PREGNANT.......YOU ARE DOOMED TO FAIL. Your study is fine...........BUT WE DO NOT LIVE UNDER THE OLD TESTAMENT, ...BUT UNDER THE NEW ONE.
ReplyDeleteLEAVE WOMEN ALONE. JESUS DO THAT. I THINK YOU CAN DO THAT, TOO.